Client-Hosted Automation Model: The Professional Choice for Client Work

What Is the Client-Hosted Model?

In a client-hosted model, the automation platform runs in the client’s own infrastructure—their cloud, servers, or n8n Cloud account—and they own the instance, the data, and the billing. You design and build the workflows, then hand the system over; the client operates and maintains it. You act as a consultant, not the operator.

In a client-hosted model:

• Workflows run inside the client’s environment — n8n (or whichever platform you use) is installed on the client’s servers, their cloud account, or their VPS. The instance, the data, and the execution all live under their control.
• Automations become part of internal operations — They’re treated like any other internal system: integrated with the client’s SSO, monitoring, backups, and change processes.
• The builder works as a consultant and implementer — You design, build, and hand over. You don’t run or operate the system day to day unless the client explicitly engages you for that.
• The system is not owned or operated by the agency — You don’t hold the keys, the billing, or the data. The client does.

This creates a clear separation of responsibility and aligns with how enterprises expect to work with external experts: they buy expertise and deliverables, not a dependency on your infrastructure.

Why Ownership and Control Matter

This structure creates a clean separation of responsibility:

• Ownership is clearly defined — The client owns the automation platform, the workflows, and the data. There’s no ambiguity about who is responsible if something goes wrong or needs to change.
• Access and permissions are controlled by the client — They decide who gets access, how credentials are rotated, and how secrets are stored. You work within their guardrails.
• API keys and billing belong to the client — Integrations (Slack, HubSpot, Stripe, etc.) are set up under the client’s accounts. No keys flow through your systems; no surprise bills land on the client because of your shared instance.
• Compliance and data handling are unambiguous — Data stays in the client’s environment. If they’re under GDPR, HIPAA, or industry rules, the boundaries are clear: the client’s instance, the client’s compliance scope.

Benefits for Both Sides

As a result:

• Risk is reduced for both sides — The client isn’t locked into your infrastructure. You’re not on the hook for their uptime, their data, or their billing. If the engagement ends, the system keeps running.
• Handover is simpler and cleaner — You deliver a running system in their environment, with documentation and optional training. There’s no “migration” from your instance to theirs—it was theirs from day one.
• Long-term maintenance is easier — The client’s IT or ops team can own backups, updates, and monitoring. You can be engaged for changes or enhancements on a clear scope, not as the permanent operator.
• The system can continue without builder lock-in — The client can bring in another consultant, hire in-house, or run it themselves. The automation isn’t tied to your continued involvement.

Client-Hosted vs. Agency-Hosted: When Does Each Make Sense?

Client-hosted is the default for:
• Ongoing or long-term client engagements
• Workflows that touch sensitive or regulated data
• Clients with their own IT or DevOps who expect to own and operate internal systems
• Projects where you want a clean, professional handover and no long-term operational liability
Agency- or builder-hosted can make sense for:
• Short pilots or proofs of concept where the client isn’t ready to spin up infrastructure
• Fully managed “automation as a service” offerings where you explicitly sell ongoing operation and support
• Very small clients with no technical team and a clear, contracted model where you operate on their behalf

Even in those cases, the trend should be toward client-hosted once the pilot is proven or the relationship matures. Treat agency-hosted as a phase, not the end state.

How to Propose and Set Up Client-Hosted Work

1. Make it the default in your proposals

Frame client-hosted as the standard: “We build and deploy into your environment. You own the instance, the credentials, and the data. We provide the design, implementation, and handover.”

2. Define the hosting requirement clearly

Specify what “your environment” means: their cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure), their VPS, or a dedicated instance in a region they choose. If they use n8n Cloud, it should be their n8n Cloud account, not yours.

3. Clarify the division of responsibilities

Who provisions the instance? Who sets up backups and monitoring? Who handles upgrades? Put it in the SOW. Often: you guide and advise; they (or their IT) execute. For smaller clients, you might do the initial setup with their credentials and accounts.

4. Use their accounts for all integrations

Every connected app—CRM, email, Slack, payments—should be authorised and billed under the client. You never hold production API keys or OAuth tokens for their systems in your own tools. This keeps compliance and liability on the right side.

Common Objections—and How to Address Them

“We don’t have the technical ability to host or run it.”

You can still do client-hosted: you set it up in their cloud or their n8n Cloud account, with their billing. You provide runbooks and optional training. They don’t need to be experts; they need to own the asset and the accounts. You can offer a retainer for support or hand-holding.

“Isn’t it easier if you just run it for us?”

Easier in the short term, perhaps—but it creates dependency, blurred responsibility, and a harder handover later. For anything beyond a short pilot, client-hosted is usually simpler in the long run. For “we want you to run it,” position that as a distinct managed service with a clear contract and SLA, not the default build-and-handover model.

“We’re not sure we want to commit to our own instance yet.”

Use a time-boxed pilot in their environment. A small, low-risk workflow in their account proves the value without you hosting. Once it’s proven, it’s already in the right place to scale.

Handover and Documentation

Client-hosted only works if the handover is real. That means:

• Documentation — Purpose of each workflow, how to run and monitor it, where credentials live, and how to make common changes.
• Access — The client has full access; you use accounts and permissions they control. At handover, you don’t “leave” anything running under your identity.
• Training (if agreed) — Enough for their team to operate, extend, or troubleshoot with your docs. Optional ongoing support can be a separate engagement.

When you hand over a system that has always lived in their environment, the conversation is straightforward: “Here’s what we built, here’s how it works, here’s how you own it.” There’s no migration, no “switching over,” and no lingering dependency on your infrastructure.

A Model That Scales

Client-hosted automations aren’t about losing control as a builder. They’re about delivering systems that align with how mature software teams operate: systems that clients can own, trust, and maintain over time. You focus on what you do best—design, build, and advise—while the client retains clear ownership, lower risk, and a path to long-term independence. For most client work, that’s the model to choose.

---

Want a complete framework for deploying and handing over client-hosted automation? Our Automation Deployment Playbook covers hosting models, security, testing, documentation, and handover so you can deliver with confidence.